*I have no problem believing that Chonqing is a "cyberpunk city," but what are these inflluencer women trying to achieve with all this handwaving English on Youtube here
https://www.youtube.com/live/c0VpCNnSbHo?si=ERATBrtGFe6Xe3wP
cf
*Apple was throwing away those chips because they were iPhone garbage, but now the cheap laptop is a big hit
@bruces au contraire, the semiconductor industry has been feeding unappealing microproduce to livestock for centuries https://www.macworld.com/article/3107278/apple-binned-chips-iphone-ipad-mac.html
tossing in a few (hobbled) higher-quality chips to meet commodity device demand is part of the scheme
@bruces Could it be they quit the low-end model to reposition the remaining one and make a new higher end with an un-binned chip?
Not that I think it would be smart product management, but if they start the run again many will be full functioning chips…
*How many "bugs" can some finite chunk of code possibly have? Will it ever run out of bugs? Can models just invent new forms of bugs to patch indefinitely?
@bruces in terms of arms race, EVERY interested party can hunt at the speed of the cheap methods, right
@bruces so far, the AI tools have not found *new forms* of bugs. They find the same forms, just new instances. So in theory they could eventually run out... but we keep adding new bugs, and the tools are still far away from finding *all* issues.
@bruces I've been using Opus to look at an OSS project I work on (something like a couple million lines of code, almost three decades old), and it's finding a large number of issues. At least half the stuff it finds is legitimately a security issue, but quite low-grade issues. Stuff that would require some kind of elevated access to already exist to take advantage of it. We'll fix them, because it's noise for future scans with LLMs, but it's not something we're urgently rushing out to users.