Medea Vanamonde 🏳️‍⚧️

@MedeaVanamonde@beige.party

Perfil original

*I admire these "scientific facts" of other eras. These are great artworks

*I don't frame them on the wall, but maybe I should

*Hmm. That's pretty much got to be some lunar-tides love-poetry by the astronomer who discovered Pluto

*What other Percival Lowell would write that? Also his sister was a well-known poet

@bruces
In Cosmos, Carl Sagan remarked on Percival Lowell's mapping of Martian canals, and belief that they were made by intelligent design, that it makes him wonder "which side of the telescope the intelligence was on."

*So, what do the fried ancient scrolls from the ruins actually say

*Some stuffy fried Greek metaphysics, so far

scrollprize.org/pdf/main.pdf

*Asian neon has become so old that it's a vanishing handicraft.

youtu.be/2QfbvK3FCE4?si=SBA9WS

RE: mastodon.social/@roadskater/11

*Who is it that you imagine is tooting all this bizarre Mastodon fodder, using the Bruce Sterling name

*And if he's that good at it, why would you believe me if I claim that it's "me"

*You ever read that sober, analytical OSS operator-manual about smashing up and sabotaging every possible device and process in Nazi-occupied Europe

*Nobody ever calls those characters "Luddites"

"What happens when we "fork" and the bro in the forkpod next-door is Sam Altman and I can't stand him

@bruces

Maybe they got one thing accidentally right though. Everyone on Earth is living in the Arctic because thanks to the pursuit of this farcical techno-dystopia the rest of the planet is uninhabitable.

H

@bruces I don't agree between choosing between valuing terrestrial life and space exploration.
Imhi, both are interlinked

As in, instead of mining and destroying our planet, we should find asteroids with the necessary materials and get those

If we worked towards doing stuff in space, instead of inside our planet, we could surely have both

P.S. Before the "is expensive" crowd comes in, that's because we currently don't calculate the ecological impact in the expenses.We throw that to the future

H

@bruces I guess it’s just another instance of “fork around, find out”.
On a more serious note, none of these suggested "forks" are actually biologically incompatible, so it seems more like a lifestyle choice, albeit at a larger scale. Since most of the choices fall straight in line with financial capabilities (you can’t have a nice simulation of you running if you’re broke), new options will only widen the social gap some more.

*Well, that one's straight out of the tinfoil hat warehouse

cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8

H

@bruces Tell me if I'm missing something: This is a description of a new way to deterministically control gene expression, for the purposes of medical research, from the external stimulus of electromagnetic fields, by which I am guessing they mean somewhat longer wavelengths than UV, infrared, which have been used for this for years. It's a little weird the abstract says "EMF" given that UV/IR are already EMFs, but otherwise it isn't looking too tin-foil-hatty to my inexperienced eyes.

"I'm a much better chef now because Claude can give me the global average of guacamole"

*It's "not science fiction" because science fiction about radio electromagnetics hasn't been a major SF topic since the salad days of Hugo Gernsback

arenaphysica.com/publications/